CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE
CIB0.DE (VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CIB0.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG, while QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CIB0.DE returned -10.87% vs 49.47% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIB0.DE achieves a -11.68% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 23.86% return.
CIB0.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- -11.68%
- 6M
- -11.71%
- 1Y
- -10.87%
- 3Y*
- -7.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 23.86%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 49.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIB0.DE VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A | -11.68% | 0.39% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 23.86% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIB0.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CIB0.DE
QUTM.DE
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIB0.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.25 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 1.99 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 4.79 | -5.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIB0.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.60%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB0.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIB0.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.60% | -24.77% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -24.77% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.17% | -11.10% | -15.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -7.79% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.91% | 10.29% | -0.38% |
Volatility
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) is 5.47%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that CIB0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIB0.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 12.75% | -7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 24.53% | -11.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 33.64% | -16.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 33.19% | -15.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 33.19% | -15.14% |
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CIB0.DE and QUTM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
CIB0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIB0.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIB0.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIB0.DE and QUTM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
CIB0.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. CIB0.DE tracks MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR).
Find the right allocation for CIB0.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer