CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE
CIB0.DE (VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A) and QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - CIB0.DE tracks the MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG while QDVG.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CIB0.DE returned -8.20%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for QDVG.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIB0.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVG.DE.
Performance
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIB0.DE achieves a -14.18% return, which is significantly lower than QDVG.DE's -1.02% return.
CIB0.DE
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -17.46%
- 1Y
- -15.36%
- 3Y*
- -8.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB0.DE VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A | -14.18% | -10.00% | 5.16% | 2.09% | -1.65% |
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIB0.DE and QDVG.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CIB0.DE and QDVG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CIB0.DE
QDVG.DE
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIB0.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.16 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 1.21 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | 2.96 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIB0.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 0.89 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 0.48 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIB0.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.60%, which is greater than QDVG.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB0.DE and QDVG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIB0.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.60% | -26.77% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -10.74% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.60% | -22.70% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.26% | -7.31% | -20.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -5.35% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 4.41% | +4.67% |
Volatility
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) at 5.24%. This indicates that CIB0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIB0.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 5.24% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 10.23% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 14.70% | +2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 14.48% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 15.77% | +2.18% |
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIB0.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIB0.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIB0.DE nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIB0.DE and QDVG.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CIB0.DE.
CIB0.DE tracks MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG, while QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CIB0.DE and 0.15% for QDVG.DE.
Find the right allocation for CIB0.DE and QDVG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer