CHZ-USD vs. MANA-USD
CHZ-USD (Chiliz) and MANA-USD (Decentraland) are both cryptocurrencies. Over the past 5 years, CHZ-USD returned -41.14%/yr vs -36.00%/yr for MANA-USD. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CHZ-USD vs. MANA-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHZ-USD achieves a -59.82% return, which is significantly lower than MANA-USD's -42.46% return.
CHZ-USD
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -34.54%
- 6M
- -65.11%
- YTD
- -59.82%
- 1Y
- -57.40%
- 3Y*
- -41.39%
- 5Y*
- -41.14%
- 10Y*
- —
MANA-USD
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- 6M
- -50.04%
- YTD
- -42.46%
- 1Y
- -77.17%
- 3Y*
- -45.98%
- 5Y*
- -36.00%
- 10Y*
- —
CHZ-USD vs. MANA-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHZ-USD Chiliz | -59.82% | -48.35% | -5.33% | -13.79% | -64.67% | 1,223.46% | 202.05% | -58.87% |
MANA-USD Decentraland | -42.46% | -73.97% | -10.59% | 75.55% | -90.91% | 4,072.47% | 159.63% | -38.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHZ-USD and MANA-USD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between CHZ-USD and MANA-USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHZ-USD vs. MANA-USD — Risk / Return Rank
CHZ-USD
MANA-USD
CHZ-USD vs. MANA-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chiliz (CHZ-USD) and Decentraland (MANA-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHZ-USD | MANA-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.82 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.93 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | -1.29 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHZ-USD vs. MANA-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHZ-USD drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, roughly equal to the maximum MANA-USD drawdown of -98.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHZ-USD and MANA-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHZ-USD | MANA-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.83% | -98.80% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.86% | -83.13% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.91% | -92.05% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.03% | -98.80% | +1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.81% | -98.65% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.71% | -78.86% | +6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.84% | 55.58% | -18.74% |
Volatility
CHZ-USD vs. MANA-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chiliz (CHZ-USD) is 17.91%, while Decentraland (MANA-USD) has a volatility of 24.42%. This indicates that CHZ-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MANA-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHZ-USD | MANA-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.91% | 24.42% | -6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.38% | 55.60% | +12.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.67% | 68.30% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.89% | 102.81% | -18.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.36% | 171.76% | -62.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHZ-USD and MANA-USD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANA-USD has higher volatility (24.42%) compared to CHZ-USD (17.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHZ-USD dropped -97.83% vs MANA-USD's -98.80%.
CHZ-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHZ-USD and MANA-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer