PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPY vs. RDTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPY vs. RDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 60.59% return, which is significantly higher than RDTY's 18.88% return.


CHPY

1D
0.07%
1M
-16.49%
6M
45.51%
YTD
60.59%
1Y
94.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
104.00%

RDTY

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.91%
6M
12.36%
YTD
18.88%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. RDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and RDTY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.67

The correlation between CHPY and RDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPY vs. RDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RDTY
RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. RDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPYRDTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

2.59

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.81

8.68

+12.13

CHPY vs. RDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the RDTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and RDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. RDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -18.27%, which is greater than RDTY's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and RDTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPYRDTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.27%

-17.31%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.27%

-9.20%

-9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.22%

-0.85%

-17.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-2.56%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

2.74%

+1.83%

Volatility

CHPY vs. RDTY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 17.75% compared to YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) at 4.07%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPYRDTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.75%

4.07%

+13.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.44%

13.21%

+18.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.88%

17.28%

+18.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.81%

21.63%

+16.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.81%

21.63%

+16.18%

CHPY vs. RDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPY vs. RDTY - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.46%, less than RDTY's 43.10% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHPY and RDTY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to RDTY (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -18.27% vs RDTY's -17.31%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 94.78% vs 23.71% for RDTY. On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RDTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 94.78% return vs 23.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

RDTY has the higher dividend yield at 43.10%, compared with 36.46% for CHPY.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 1.01% for RDTY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPY and RDTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer