CHPS vs. XAIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while XAIX is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHPS returned 141.43% vs 44.17% for XAIX. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAIX.

Performance

CHPS vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 70.98% return, which is significantly higher than XAIX's 26.72% return.

CHPS

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -11.74%
• 6M: 41.98%
• YTD: 70.98%
• 1Y: 141.43%
• 3Y*: 49.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 46.83%

XAIX

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 23.91%
• YTD: 26.72%
• 1Y: 44.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 37.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	$2.66M	$2.47M	$3.90M
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	$884.34K	$1.44M	$1.97M

CHPS vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	70.98%	58.47%	-3.68%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	26.72%	29.05%	15.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and XAIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.80

The correlation between CHPS and XAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS vs. XAIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHPS	XAIX
Technology	99.6%	79.0%
Energy	0.6%	0.0%
Industrials	0.4%	0.1%
Financial Services	0.2%	4.4%
Communication Services	0.0%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 93
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 94

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPS vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPS	XAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.12	1.72	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.27	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.29	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	2.62	+1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.16	7.87	+10.29

CHPS vs. XAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the XAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and XAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than XAIX's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and XAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	XAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-23.95%	-15.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.74%	-16.95%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.91%	-10.78%	-14.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-4.00%	-5.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.82%	5.63%	+2.19%

Volatility

CHPS vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) at 9.09%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	XAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.17%	9.09%	+10.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.21%	23.04%	+17.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.64%	25.87%	+19.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.27%	25.11%	+12.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.27%	25.11%	+12.16%

CHPS vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XAIX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than XAIX's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.38%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and XAIX in my portfolio?

CHPS and XAIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPS or XAIX?

CHPS has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to XAIX (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs XAIX's -23.95%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or XAIX?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 141.43% vs 44.17% for XAIX. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XAIX has been the lower-risk option at 9.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or XAIX?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 141.43% return vs 44.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or XAIX?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or XAIX?

XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.38% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between CHPS and XAIX?

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while XAIX is Artificial Intelligence. CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.35% for XAIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.