CHPS vs. SOXL
CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while SOXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS returned 54.34%/yr vs 90.03%/yr for SOXL. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
CHPS vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 92.17% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 320.32% return.
CHPS
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- 6M
- 72.81%
- YTD
- 92.17%
- 1Y
- 156.63%
- 3Y*
- 54.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- 6.83%
- 1M
- -24.72%
- 6M
- 215.07%
- YTD
- 320.32%
- 1Y
- 566.84%
- 3Y*
- 90.03%
- 5Y*
- 35.80%
- 10Y*
- 57.12%
CHPS vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 92.17% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 320.32% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 22.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and SOXL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between CHPS and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHPS vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHPS
SOXL
Technology
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CHPS
SOXL
Energy
CHPS
SOXL
-
Industrials
CHPS
SOXL
-
Financial Services
CHPS
SOXL
-
Communication Services
CHPS
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHPS
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
CHPS
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
CHPS
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
CHPS
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
CHPS
-
SOXL
-
Utilities
CHPS
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
SOXL
CHPS vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.85 | 12.70 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.22 | 36.42 | -8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -90.46% | +51.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.80% | -45.05% | +27.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.44% | -87.88% | +48.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.60% | -41.26% | +25.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -34.94% | +25.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 15.67% | -10.10% |
Volatility
CHPS vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) is 21.97%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 62.00%. This indicates that CHPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.97% | 62.00% | -40.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.59% | 108.24% | -70.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.83% | 123.87% | -81.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.45% | 111.87% | -75.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.45% | 101.35% | -64.90% |
CHPS vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than SOXL's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.01% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CHPS and SOXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SOXL has higher volatility (62.00%) compared to CHPS (21.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 3-year performance, SOXL leads with 90.03% vs 54.34% for CHPS. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CHPS has been the lower-risk option at 21.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 90.03% return vs 54.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOXL.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.01% for SOXL.
CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while SOXL is Leveraged Equities. CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 3.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPS and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer