CHPS vs. SHOC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SHOC tracks the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHPS returned 223.67% vs 149.45% for SHOC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SHOC.

Performance

CHPS vs. SHOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 107.97% return, which is significantly higher than SHOC's 73.38% return.

CHPS

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 32.32%
• YTD: 107.97%
• 6M: 109.04%
• 1Y: 223.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SHOC

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 25.12%
• YTD: 73.38%
• 6M: 70.44%
• 1Y: 149.45%
• 3Y*: 53.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS vs. SHOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.97%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF	73.38%	49.91%	16.74%	10.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and SHOC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.94

The correlation between CHPS and SHOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS vs. SHOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHPS	SHOC
Technology	98.8%	100.0%
Energy	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.4%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. SHOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

SHOC

SHOC Risk / Return Rank: 95
SHOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SHOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SHOC Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SHOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SHOC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS vs. SHOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPS	SHOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.54	4.78	+1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.07	4.84	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.66	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.87	10.30	+2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	49.99	38.30	+11.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPS vs. SHOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 6.54, which is higher than the SHOC Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and SHOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPS	SHOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.54	4.78	+1.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.81	1.55	+0.26

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. SHOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than SHOC's maximum drawdown of -37.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and SHOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	SHOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-37.54%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-14.59%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.16%	-7.47%	-1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	3.92%	+0.58%

Volatility

CHPS vs. SHOC - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) at 11.47%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	SHOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.18%	11.47%	+2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.19%	24.61%	+3.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.43%	31.53%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.78%	35.16%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.78%	35.16%	-1.38%

CHPS vs. SHOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SHOC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS vs. SHOC - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than SHOC's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF	0.14%	0.23%	0.35%	0.65%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and SHOC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CHPS and SHOC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CHPS or SHOC?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to SHOC (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs SHOC's -37.54%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or SHOC?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 149.45% for SHOC. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHOC has been the lower-risk option at 11.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or SHOC?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 149.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or SHOC?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or SHOC?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.

What is the main difference between CHPS and SHOC?

CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.40% for SHOC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 4.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.