CHPS vs. FTXL
CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index while FTXL tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS returned 49.43%/yr vs 45.38%/yr for FTXL. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
CHPS vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CHPS having a 70.98% return and FTXL slightly lower at 68.79%.
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- 6M
- 41.98%
- YTD
- 70.98%
- 1Y
- 141.43%
- 3Y*
- 49.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.83%
FTXL
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -12.68%
- 6M
- 40.05%
- YTD
- 68.79%
- 1Y
- 129.18%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 26.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.66M | $2.47M | $3.90M | |
| $142.99M | $99.08M | $87.36M |
CHPS vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 70.98% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 68.79% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 14.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and FTXL is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between CHPS and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHPS vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHPS
FTXL
Technology
Energy
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CHPS
FTXL
Energy
CHPS
FTXL
-
Industrials
CHPS
FTXL
Financial Services
CHPS
FTXL
-
Communication Services
CHPS
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHPS
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
CHPS
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
CHPS
-
FTXL
-
Healthcare
CHPS
-
FTXL
-
Real Estate
CHPS
-
FTXL
-
Utilities
CHPS
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
FTXL
CHPS vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.40 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 3.98 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.16 | 16.86 | +1.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -43.87% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.74% | -32.64% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.44% | -41.57% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -26.40% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -10.61% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.82% | 7.69% | +0.13% |
Volatility
CHPS vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) at 18.15%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.17% | 18.15% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.21% | 39.70% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.64% | 46.19% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 38.25% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 35.28% | +1.99% |
CHPS vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than FTXL's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.38% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.11% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CHPS and FTXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CHPS has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to FTXL (18.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 49.43% vs 45.38% for FTXL. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FTXL has been the lower-risk option at 18.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 49.43% return vs 45.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.11% for FTXL.
CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.60% for FTXL.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPS and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer