CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).
CHPS-U.TO and IAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHPS-U.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2021. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jan 21, 2005. Both CHPS-U.TO and IAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 6.93% | 51.84% | 11.58% | 75.77% | -43.11% | -2.63% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 10.48% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | 2.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS-U.TO achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 10.48% return.
CHPS-U.TO
- 1D
- 8.61%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- 86.00%
- 3Y*
- 34.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 52.36%
- 3Y*
- 33.88%
- 5Y*
- 22.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS-U.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS-U.TO
IAU
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPS-U.TO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 1.90 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.33 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.48 | 2.72 | +3.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.99 | 9.95 | +9.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPS-U.TO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.90 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.65 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS-U.TO and IAU is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
CHPS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.01% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS-U.TO and IAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS-U.TO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.70% | -45.14% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -19.18% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -11.71% | +6.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -15.98% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 5.23% | -0.77% |
Volatility
CHPS-U.TO vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 10.44%. This indicates that CHPS-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS-U.TO | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.07% | 10.44% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 24.15% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.98% | 27.64% | +11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.25% | 17.70% | +21.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.25% | 15.83% | +23.42% |