CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHPS-U.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and FINN.NEO (Fidelity Global Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS-U.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while FINN.NEO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. CHPS-U.TO is passively managed, while FINN.NEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS-U.TO returned 49.75%/yr vs 44.34%/yr for FINN.NEO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHPS-U.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for FINN.NEO.

Performance

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CHPS-U.TO is traded in USD, while FINN.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FINN.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS-U.TO achieves a 62.87% return, which is significantly higher than FINN.NEO's 40.26% return.

CHPS-U.TO

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 25.87%
• YTD: 62.87%
• 6M: 61.65%
• 1Y: 135.95%
• 3Y*: 49.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FINN.NEO

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 10.85%
• YTD: 40.26%
• 6M: 41.84%
• 1Y: 72.41%
• 3Y*: 44.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	62.87%	51.84%	11.58%	38.18%
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF	40.26%	26.39%	46.12%	21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS-U.TO and FINN.NEO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2023	0.19

Return for Risk

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS-U.TO

CHPS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FINN.NEO

FINN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 89
FINN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FINN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FINN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FINN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FINN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPS-U.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	3.13	+0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	3.79	+0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.50	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.46	5.12	+5.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	32.71	18.58	+14.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is comparable to the FINN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS-U.TO and FINN.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPS-U.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92	3.13	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.99	-1.42

Drawdowns

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than FINN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -25.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS-U.TO and FINN.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS-U.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.70%	-25.91%	-27.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	-14.21%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.79%	-25.91%	-12.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.15%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-4.30%	-13.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	3.91%	+0.26%

Volatility

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) at 8.01%. This indicates that CHPS-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FINN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS-U.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.79%	8.01%	+2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.57%	18.55%	+9.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.90%	23.27%	+11.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.32%	23.32%	+16.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.32%	23.32%	+16.00%

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS-U.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FINN.NEO's 1.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS-U.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHPS-U.TO nor FINN.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	0.00%	0.01%	0.14%	0.40%	0.72%	0.01%
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS-U.TO and FINN.NEO in my portfolio?

CHPS-U.TO and FINN.NEO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHPS-U.TO or FINN.NEO?

On fees, CHPS-U.TO is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS-U.TO or FINN.NEO?

CHPS-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for FINN.NEO.

What is the main difference between CHPS-U.TO and FINN.NEO?

CHPS-U.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while FINN.NEO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS-U.TO and 1.13% for FINN.NEO.