PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHIAX vs. FRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHIAX vs. FRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIAX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly higher than FRA's -1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIAX has underperformed FRA with an annualized return of 4.39%, while FRA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.43% annualized return.


CHIAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.88%
6M
2.86%
YTD
2.86%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
4.39%

FRA

1D
0.37%
1M
0.22%
6M
-4.50%
YTD
-1.25%
1Y
-7.26%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
6.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHIAX vs. FRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHIAX
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund
2.86%4.25%6.85%11.03%-3.14%5.03%2.32%6.67%-0.22%4.33%
FRA
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc
-1.25%-3.75%21.56%25.46%-10.59%17.81%-2.38%20.82%-8.27%0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CHIAX and FRA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2003

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHIAX vs. FRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIAX
CHIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CHIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FRA
FRA Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRA Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIAX vs. FRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHIAXFRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

0.88

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

-0.47

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

-0.89

+7.69

CHIAX vs. FRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the FRA Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIAX and FRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHIAX vs. FRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIAX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum FRA drawdown of -51.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIAX and FRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHIAXFRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-51.43%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-15.47%

+13.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-18.77%

+16.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.99%

-18.77%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.94%

-42.80%

+22.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-9.67%

+9.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-7.23%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

8.16%

-7.50%

Volatility

CHIAX vs. FRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) is 1.43%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) has a volatility of 2.16%. This indicates that CHIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHIAXFRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

2.16%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

8.07%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

9.99%

-7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.82%

12.90%

-10.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.60%

15.52%

-11.92%

CHIAX vs. FRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FRA's 2.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHIAX vs. FRA - Dividend Comparison

CHIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, less than FRA's 13.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHIAX
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund
6.46%7.44%7.25%7.19%3.90%3.38%4.19%4.94%4.38%3.79%4.47%4.26%
FRA
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc
13.65%12.62%10.81%10.44%6.88%5.96%7.61%6.44%6.90%5.31%5.65%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHIAX and FRA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRA has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to CHIAX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIAX dropped -37.29% vs FRA's -51.43%.

CHIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHIAX and FRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer