CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L
CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) and XCNA.L (Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds. CHI3.L is actively managed, while XCNA.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHI3.L returned -15.83%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for XCNA.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHI3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XCNA.L.
Performance
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHI3.L achieves a -36.01% return, which is significantly lower than XCNA.L's 9.69% return.
CHI3.L
- 1D
- 6.48%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -44.40%
- YTD
- -36.01%
- 1Y
- -29.49%
- 3Y*
- -15.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCNA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | -36.01% | 50.00% | 6.20% | -53.60% | -46.49% |
XCNA.L Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 9.69% | 32.54% | 14.47% | -12.47% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHI3.L and XCNA.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CHI3.L and XCNA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHI3.L
XCNA.L
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHI3.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 4.74 | -5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 13.37 | -14.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHI3.L drawdown since its inception was -84.75%, which is greater than XCNA.L's maximum drawdown of -32.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI3.L and XCNA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHI3.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.75% | -32.05% | -52.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.95% | -7.34% | -56.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.83% | -27.66% | -38.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.35% | -5.15% | -72.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -13.98% | -50.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.35% | 2.61% | +31.74% |
Volatility
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to Xtrackers MSCI China A ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCNA.L) at 8.24%. This indicates that CHI3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHI3.L | XCNA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | 8.24% | +9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.76% | 14.15% | +31.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.04% | 18.67% | +42.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 24.53% | +58.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 24.53% | +58.48% |
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHI3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XCNA.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHI3.L vs. XCNA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHI3.L nor XCNA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHI3.L and XCNA.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCNA.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCNA.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHI3.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHI3.L and 0.29% for XCNA.L.
Find the right allocation for CHI3.L and XCNA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer