CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) and XCHA.L (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds. CHI3.L is actively managed, while XCHA.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHI3.L returned -15.83%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for XCHA.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHI3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCHA.L.

Performance

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHI3.L achieves a -36.01% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.L's 9.79% return.

CHI3.L

• 1D: 6.48%
• 1M: -5.40%
• 6M: -44.40%
• YTD: -36.01%
• 1Y: -29.49%
• 3Y*: -15.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XCHA.L

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.60%
• 6M: 7.00%
• YTD: 9.79%
• 1Y: 33.96%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: 8.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities	-36.01%	50.00%	6.20%	-53.60%	-45.60%
XCHA.L Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	9.79%	30.11%	16.00%	-11.00%	-6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CHI3.L and XCHA.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022	0.74

The correlation between CHI3.L and XCHA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHI3.L	XCHA.L
Consumer Cyclical	25.6%	6.2%
Financial Services	19.1%	18.8%
Communication Services	18.5%	1.5%
Technology	11.1%	31.6%
Basic Materials	5.4%	9.1%
Industrials	5.3%	16.0%
Healthcare	5.1%	4.3%
Energy	3.5%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	6.6%
Utilities	1.7%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.6%	0.4%

Return for Risk

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHI3.L

CHI3.L Risk / Return Rank: 5
CHI3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CHI3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CHI3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CHI3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CHI3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5

XCHA.L

XCHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XCHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XCHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
XCHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XCHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHI3.L	XCHA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	1.80	-2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	2.51	-2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.32	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	4.82	-5.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	13.29	-14.15

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHI3.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHI3.L and XCHA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHI3.L drawdown since its inception was -84.75%, which is greater than XCHA.L's maximum drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI3.L and XCHA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHI3.L	XCHA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.75%	-50.90%	-33.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.95%	-7.02%	-56.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.83%	-26.85%	-38.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.35%	-4.94%	-72.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.92%	-24.00%	-40.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.35%	2.55%	+31.80%

Volatility

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) at 8.65%. This indicates that CHI3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCHA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHI3.L	XCHA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.27%	8.65%	+8.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.76%	14.40%	+31.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.04%	18.83%	+42.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.01%	22.62%	+60.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.01%	22.77%	+60.24%

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHI3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHI3.L vs. XCHA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHI3.L nor XCHA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHI3.L and XCHA.L in my portfolio?

CHI3.L and XCHA.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHI3.L or XCHA.L?

On fees, XCHA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHI3.L or XCHA.L?

XCHA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHI3.L.

What is the main difference between CHI3.L and XCHA.L?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHI3.L and 0.50% for XCHA.L.