CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L
CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) and TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - CHI3.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while TSLI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHI3.L returned -15.99% vs 46.91% for TSLI.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHI3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSLI.L.
Performance
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHI3.L achieves a -29.68% return, which is significantly lower than TSLI.L's -9.68% return.
CHI3.L
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- -29.68%
- 6M
- -34.17%
- 1Y
- -15.99%
- 3Y*
- -10.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLI.L
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- -9.68%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 46.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | -29.68% | 49.93% | 18.51% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | -9.68% | 40.52% | 28.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHI3.L and TSLI.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHI3.L
TSLI.L
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHI3.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 1.87 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 4.75 | -5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHI3.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 1.25 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.71 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHI3.L drawdown since its inception was -84.78%, which is greater than TSLI.L's maximum drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI3.L and TSLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHI3.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.78% | -41.20% | -43.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.06% | -24.94% | -28.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.11% | -15.33% | -59.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.47% | -12.03% | -52.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.04% | 9.82% | +18.22% |
Volatility
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a higher volatility of 24.11% compared to IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) at 12.09%. This indicates that CHI3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHI3.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.11% | 12.09% | +12.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.67% | 25.47% | +18.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.52% | 37.64% | +21.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.76% | 43.19% | +40.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.76% | 43.19% | +40.57% |
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHI3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHI3.L vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison
CHI3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | 74.25% | 73.68% | 19.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHI3.L and TSLI.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHI3.L.
CHI3.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHI3.L and 0.55% for TSLI.L.
Find the right allocation for CHI3.L and TSLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer