CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L
CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) and QQQY.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - CHI3.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QQQY.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHI3.L returned -17.31% vs 30.96% for QQQY.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHI3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQY.L.
Performance
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHI3.L achieves a -29.68% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.L's 15.10% return.
CHI3.L
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- YTD
- -29.68%
- 6M
- -35.92%
- 1Y
- -17.31%
- 3Y*
- -10.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | -29.68% | 49.93% | 21.55% |
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 15.10% | 14.25% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHI3.L and QQQY.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHI3.L
QQQY.L
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHI3.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 4.32 | -4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 13.40 | -13.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHI3.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 2.18 | -2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 1.02 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHI3.L drawdown since its inception was -84.78%, which is greater than QQQY.L's maximum drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI3.L and QQQY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHI3.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.78% | -19.23% | -65.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.06% | -7.34% | -45.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.11% | -0.93% | -74.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.47% | -3.18% | -61.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.04% | 2.37% | +25.67% |
Volatility
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a higher volatility of 24.11% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) at 4.78%. This indicates that CHI3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHI3.L | QQQY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.11% | 4.78% | +19.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.67% | 10.22% | +33.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.52% | 14.52% | +45.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.76% | 20.98% | +62.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.76% | 20.98% | +62.78% |
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHI3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHI3.L vs. QQQY.L - Dividend Comparison
CHI3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP | 67.73% | 120.60% | 18.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHI3.L and QQQY.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHI3.L.
CHI3.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHI3.L and 0.45% for QQQY.L.
Find the right allocation for CHI3.L and QQQY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer