CHI3.L vs. JREC.L
CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) and JREC.L (JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHI3.L returned -15.83%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for JREC.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CHI3.L vs. JREC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHI3.L achieves a -36.01% return, which is significantly lower than JREC.L's 9.52% return.
CHI3.L
- 1D
- 6.48%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -44.40%
- YTD
- -36.01%
- 1Y
- -29.49%
- 3Y*
- -15.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JREC.L
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHI3.L vs. JREC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | -36.01% | 50.00% | 6.20% | -53.60% | -45.60% |
JREC.L JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 9.52% | 28.38% | 9.65% | -13.02% | -7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHI3.L and JREC.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CHI3.L and JREC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHI3.L vs. JREC.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHI3.L
JREC.L
CHI3.L vs. JREC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHI3.L | JREC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.31 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 4.53 | -4.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 12.00 | -12.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHI3.L vs. JREC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHI3.L drawdown since its inception was -84.75%, which is greater than JREC.L's maximum drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI3.L and JREC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHI3.L | JREC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.75% | -37.92% | -46.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.95% | -7.22% | -56.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.83% | -27.06% | -38.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.35% | -5.30% | -72.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -18.94% | -45.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.35% | 2.73% | +31.62% |
Volatility
CHI3.L vs. JREC.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to JPM China A Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREC.L) at 8.90%. This indicates that CHI3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JREC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHI3.L | JREC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | 8.90% | +8.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.76% | 14.69% | +31.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.04% | 18.76% | +42.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 23.02% | +59.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 23.02% | +59.99% |
Dividends
CHI3.L vs. JREC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHI3.L nor JREC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHI3.L and JREC.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ETF Issuer.
Find the right allocation for CHI3.L and JREC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer