CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L
CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) and FLQA.L (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds. CHI3.L is actively managed, while FLQA.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHI3.L returned -15.83%/yr vs 25.15%/yr for FLQA.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHI3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLQA.L.
Performance
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHI3.L achieves a -36.01% return, which is significantly lower than FLQA.L's 32.52% return.
CHI3.L
- 1D
- 6.48%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -44.40%
- YTD
- -36.01%
- 1Y
- -29.49%
- 3Y*
- -15.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLQA.L
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -9.13%
- 6M
- 26.58%
- YTD
- 32.52%
- 1Y
- 52.26%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- —
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | -36.01% | 50.00% | 6.20% | -53.60% | -45.60% |
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 32.52% | 29.84% | 7.76% | 12.02% | -6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHI3.L and FLQA.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between CHI3.L and FLQA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHI3.L
FLQA.L
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FLQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHI3.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.37 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 3.75 | -4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 11.86 | -12.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHI3.L drawdown since its inception was -84.75%, which is greater than FLQA.L's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI3.L and FLQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHI3.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.75% | -29.21% | -55.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.95% | -13.77% | -50.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.83% | -22.19% | -43.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.35% | -12.64% | -64.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -7.22% | -57.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.35% | 4.36% | +29.99% |
Volatility
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FLQA.L) at 11.18%. This indicates that CHI3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHI3.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | 11.18% | +6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.76% | 22.99% | +22.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.04% | 25.11% | +35.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 17.74% | +65.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 18.52% | +64.49% |
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHI3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQA.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHI3.L vs. FLQA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHI3.L nor FLQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHI3.L and FLQA.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLQA.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLQA.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHI3.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHI3.L and 0.14% for FLQA.L.
Find the right allocation for CHI3.L and FLQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer