PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHGX vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHGX vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHGX vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 10.10% return.


CHGX

1D
0.90%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

FMTM

1D
1.78%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
10.10%
6M
17.46%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHGX vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CHGX vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGX
CHGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHGX vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHGXFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.68

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

2.20

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.23

-1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.53

12.18

-6.65

CHGX vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHGX and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHGXFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.68

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.71

-1.12

Correlation

The correlation between CHGX and FMTM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CHGX vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
0.68%0.67%0.76%0.94%1.11%0.56%0.58%0.86%0.00%0.59%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CHGX vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHGXFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-12.12%

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-12.12%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-6.27%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-1.89%

-4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.21%

-0.49%

Volatility

CHGX vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) is 5.52%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that CHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHGXFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

10.78%

-5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

19.28%

-8.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

23.38%

-5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

23.19%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

23.19%

-3.77%