CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (CHE-UN.TO) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO).
Performance
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHE-UN.TO Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund | 10.34% | 43.14% | 37.53% | 1.90% | 30.66% | 37.93% | -40.45% | 18.66% | -41.30% | 9.25% |
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | -14.02% | 11.22% | 31.00% | 6.96% | 21.06% | 11.37% | 10.01% | 45.11% | -2.83% | 12.14% |
Fundamentals
CHE-UN.TO:
CA$1.84B
IFC.TO:
CA$43.48B
CHE-UN.TO:
CA$1.23
IFC.TO:
CA$18.86
CHE-UN.TO:
13.10
IFC.TO:
12.95
CHE-UN.TO:
1.68
IFC.TO:
0.60
CHE-UN.TO:
0.91
IFC.TO:
1.67
CHE-UN.TO:
2.37
IFC.TO:
2.28
CHE-UN.TO:
CA$2.00B
IFC.TO:
CA$26.07B
CHE-UN.TO:
CA$460.09M
IFC.TO:
CA$5.70B
CHE-UN.TO:
CA$523.56M
IFC.TO:
CA$5.33B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHE-UN.TO achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than IFC.TO's -14.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CHE-UN.TO has underperformed IFC.TO with an annualized return of 7.52%, while IFC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.
CHE-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 23.97%
- 1Y
- 72.58%
- 3Y*
- 35.50%
- 5Y*
- 26.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
IFC.TO
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- -14.02%
- 6M
- -7.52%
- 1Y
- -16.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CHE-UN.TO
IFC.TO
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (CHE-UN.TO) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHE-UN.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | -0.83 | +3.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | -1.06 | +4.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.87 | +0.68 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | -0.70 | +6.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.07 | -1.25 | +22.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHE-UN.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | -0.83 | +3.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.68 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.70 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.62 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHE-UN.TO and IFC.TO is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Dividend Comparison
CHE-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than IFC.TO's 2.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHE-UN.TO Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund | 4.33% | 4.68% | 6.03% | 7.04% | 6.69% | 8.11% | 12.01% | 10.88% | 11.45% | 6.19% | 6.34% | 6.72% |
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | 2.24% | 1.86% | 1.85% | 2.16% | 2.05% | 2.07% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 2.82% | 2.44% | 2.41% | 2.39% |
Drawdowns
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHE-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.56%, which is greater than IFC.TO's maximum drawdown of -53.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHE-UN.TO and IFC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHE-UN.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.56% | -53.53% | -24.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -21.67% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | -21.67% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.56% | -30.57% | -46.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -21.67% | +20.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -8.84% | -10.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 12.20% | -8.67% |
Volatility
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (CHE-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO) at 6.72%. This indicates that CHE-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHE-UN.TO | IFC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 6.72% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.32% | 14.49% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.40% | 20.19% | +6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 17.13% | +10.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.07% | 18.44% | +15.63% |
Financials
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund and Intact Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHE-UN.TO vs. IFC.TO - Profitability Comparison
CHE-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund reported a gross profit of 85.92M and revenue of 502.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.1%.
IFC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.63B and revenue of 6.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
CHE-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund reported an operating income of 86.35M and revenue of 502.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.
IFC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.21B and revenue of 6.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
CHE-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund reported a net income of 38.25M and revenue of 502.04M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
IFC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intact Financial Corporation reported a net income of 961.00M and revenue of 6.64B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.