PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHDRY vs. MBGYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Christian Dior SE ADR (CHDRY) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHDRY achieves a -22.18% return, which is significantly lower than MBGYY's -12.67% return.


CHDRY

1D
0.00%
1M
6.59%
YTD
-22.18%
6M
-22.26%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
-11.68%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
15.65%

MBGYY

1D
-3.55%
1M
3.60%
YTD
-12.67%
6M
-8.55%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
-2.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CHDRY
Christian Dior SE ADR
-22.18%19.90%-22.42%10.79%21.51%
MBGYY
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
-12.67%38.11%-13.59%13.78%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CHDRY and MBGYY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022

0.20

Fundamentals

EPS

CHDRY:

$26.95

MBGYY:

$1.26

PE Ratio

CHDRY:

4.95

MBGYY:

11.41

PS Ratio

CHDRY:

0.29

MBGYY:

0.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHDRY:

$165.19B

MBGYY:

$131.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHDRY:

$108.56B

MBGYY:

$21.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHDRY:

$46.92B

MBGYY:

$19.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHDRY vs. MBGYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHDRY
CHDRY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CHDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CHDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MBGYY
MBGYY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MBGYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBGYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBGYY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MBGYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBGYY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Christian Dior SE ADR (CHDRY) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHDRYMBGYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.05

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.23

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

0.54

+0.25

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHDRY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the MBGYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHDRY and MBGYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHDRYMBGYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

0.16

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.30

+0.07

Drawdowns

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHDRY drawdown since its inception was -48.64%, which is greater than MBGYY's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDRY and MBGYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHDRYMBGYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.64%

-33.47%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.24%

-19.10%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.64%

-33.47%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.96%

-15.03%

-25.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.94%

-11.79%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.81%

8.17%

+6.64%

Volatility

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Volatility Comparison

Christian Dior SE ADR (CHDRY) has a higher volatility of 17.82% compared to Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY) at 8.25%. This indicates that CHDRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBGYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHDRYMBGYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.82%

8.25%

+9.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.54%

19.01%

+22.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.76%

27.38%

+27.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.44%

27.60%

+24.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.33%

27.60%

+14.73%

Dividends

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Dividend Comparison

CHDRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than MBGYY's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHDRY
Christian Dior SE ADR
3.13%2.23%2.30%1.72%1.72%0.99%1.02%8.52%1.78%1.42%3.70%6.14%
MBGYY
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
7.04%6.95%10.45%8.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Christian Dior SE ADR and Mercedes-Benz Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B202120222023202420252026
40.69B
32.12B
(CHDRY) Total Revenue
(MBGYY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Christian Dior SE ADR and Mercedes-Benz Group AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
61.9%
17.3%
Portfolio components
CHDRY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Christian Dior SE ADR reported a gross profit of 25.18B and revenue of 40.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

MBGYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported a gross profit of 5.55B and revenue of 32.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.

CHDRY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Christian Dior SE ADR reported an operating income of 7.09B and revenue of 40.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

MBGYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 32.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

CHDRY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Christian Dior SE ADR reported a net income of 2.14B and revenue of 40.69B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

MBGYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 32.12B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHDRY and MBGYY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHDRY has higher volatility (17.82%) compared to MBGYY (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHDRY dropped -48.64% vs MBGYY's -33.47%.

CHDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHDRY and MBGYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer