CHDRY vs. MBGYY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Christian Dior SE ADR (CHDRY) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY).

Performance

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Christian Dior SE ADR (CHDRY) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHDRY Christian Dior SE ADR	-29.14%	19.90%	-22.42%	10.79%	21.51%
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG	-13.21%	38.11%	-13.59%	13.78%	12.68%

Fundamentals

EPS CHDRY : $26.95 MBGYY : $1.31
PE Ratio CHDRY : 4.60 MBGYY : 11.61
PS Ratio CHDRY : 0.27 MBGYY : 0.45
Total Revenue (TTM) CHDRY : $165.19B MBGYY : $131.90B
Gross Profit (TTM) CHDRY : $108.56B MBGYY : $22.28B
EBITDA (TTM) CHDRY : $46.92B MBGYY : $5.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHDRY achieves a -29.14% return, which is significantly lower than MBGYY's -13.21% return.

CHDRY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -21.61%
• YTD: -29.14%
• 6M: -13.10%
• 1Y: -14.71%
• 3Y*: -15.30%
• 5Y*: -0.49%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

MBGYY

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: -12.00%
• YTD: -13.21%
• 6M: -2.93%
• 1Y: 13.23%
• 3Y*: 0.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHDRY vs. MBGYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHDRY

CHDRY Risk / Return Rank: 27
CHDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CHDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CHDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CHDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CHDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

MBGYY

MBGYY Risk / Return Rank: 55
MBGYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MBGYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MBGYY Omega Ratio Rank: 50
MBGYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
MBGYY Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Christian Dior SE ADR (CHDRY) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHDRY	MBGYY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.44	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.00	0.85	-0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.10	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	0.54	-0.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	1.68	-2.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHDRY Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the MBGYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHDRY and MBGYY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHDRY	MBGYY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	0.44	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.31	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between CHDRY and MBGYY is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Dividend Comparison

CHDRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than MBGYY's 8.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHDRY Christian Dior SE ADR	3.14%	2.23%	2.30%	1.72%	1.72%	0.99%	1.02%	8.52%	1.78%	1.42%	3.70%	6.14%
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG	8.01%	6.95%	10.45%	8.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHDRY drawdown since its inception was -48.64%, which is greater than MBGYY's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDRY and MBGYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHDRY	MBGYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.64%	-33.47%	-15.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.21%	-19.10%	-13.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.24%	-15.56%	-30.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.56%	-11.71%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.92%	6.13%	+5.79%

Volatility

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Volatility Comparison

Christian Dior SE ADR (CHDRY) has a higher volatility of 16.85% compared to Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY) at 7.53%. This indicates that CHDRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBGYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHDRY	MBGYY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.85%	7.53%	+9.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.62%	18.35%	+20.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.27%	30.30%	+25.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.05%	27.55%	+23.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.52%	27.55%	+13.97%

Financials

CHDRY vs. MBGYY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Christian Dior SE ADR and Mercedes-Benz Group AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CHDRY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Christian Dior SE ADR reported a gross profit of 25.18B and revenue of 40.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

MBGYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported a gross profit of 5.27B and revenue of 33.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

CHDRY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Christian Dior SE ADR reported an operating income of 7.09B and revenue of 40.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

MBGYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported an operating income of 2.63B and revenue of 33.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

CHDRY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Christian Dior SE ADR reported a net income of 2.14B and revenue of 40.69B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

MBGYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 33.37B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.