PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHCLX vs. VSNGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCLX achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than VSNGX's 8.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCLX has outperformed VSNGX with an annualized return of 14.01%, while VSNGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.13% annualized return.


CHCLX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.92%
YTD
17.32%
6M
14.17%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
14.01%

VSNGX

1D
0.83%
1M
2.46%
YTD
8.88%
6M
7.26%
1Y
14.21%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHCLX
AB Discovery Growth Fund
17.32%6.67%17.37%18.72%-36.11%11.63%52.90%39.99%-4.56%32.58%
VSNGX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund
8.88%6.09%18.60%16.15%-16.03%19.97%22.62%32.73%-8.20%21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCLX and VSNGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996

0.88

The correlation between CHCLX and VSNGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHCLX vs. VSNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHCLX
CHCLX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CHCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CHCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VSNGX
VSNGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VSNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHCLXVSNGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.61

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

6.01

+0.61

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the VSNGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCLX and VSNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCLX drawdown since its inception was -63.85%, which is greater than VSNGX's maximum drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCLX and VSNGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHCLXVSNGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.85%

-54.50%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.70%

-8.24%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.36%

-18.96%

-11.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.63%

-25.08%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.63%

-38.33%

-6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-0.01%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

-7.42%

-6.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

2.21%

+2.03%

Volatility

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Volatility Comparison

AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX) at 3.94%. This indicates that CHCLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSNGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHCLXVSNGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.55%

3.94%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.10%

9.61%

+9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.66%

12.71%

+10.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.95%

17.44%

+8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.03%

19.56%

+5.47%

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHCLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than VSNGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHCLX vs. VSNGX - Dividend Comparison

CHCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, more than VSNGX's 5.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHCLX
AB Discovery Growth Fund
9.89%11.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%17.54%15.15%13.36%20.33%6.74%0.00%6.08%
VSNGX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund
5.65%6.15%8.60%0.50%2.81%7.63%11.65%8.60%12.95%5.79%3.37%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHCLX and VSNGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHCLX has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to VSNGX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCLX dropped -63.85% vs VSNGX's -54.50%.

CHCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHCLX and VSNGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer