CHASX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CHASX (Chase Growth Fund) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CHASX returned 20.71%/yr vs 18.01%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHASX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHASX achieves a 26.58% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CHASX has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 20.71%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.01% annualized return.

CHASX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 26.58%
• 6M: 24.69%
• 1Y: 50.78%
• 3Y*: 41.67%
• 5Y*: 22.61%
• 10Y*: 20.71%

FCNTX

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 14.58%
• 10Y*: 18.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	26.58%	20.61%	64.71%	25.91%	-20.41%	22.32%	18.27%	42.63%	-3.96%	24.49%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CHASX and FCNTX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 1997	0.92

The correlation between CHASX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CHASX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHASX

CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHASX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.61	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	2.22	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.29	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.25	2.14	+3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.72	8.97	+12.75

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHASX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHASX drawdown since its inception was -45.94%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHASX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHASX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.94%	-49.19%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.90%	-11.30%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.40%	-19.75%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.63%	-32.59%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	-32.59%	+2.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-2.59%	+2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-8.15%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	2.69%	-0.30%

Volatility

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) have volatilities of 6.53% and 6.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHASX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.53%	6.33%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.24%	11.87%	+2.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.25%	15.10%	+3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.36%	19.32%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	19.76%	+0.20%

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHASX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHASX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

CHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, more than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	7.21%	9.12%	36.67%	5.80%	5.49%	20.15%	7.83%	22.82%	12.92%	11.92%	9.14%	10.24%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.30%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHASX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

CHASX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHASX or FCNTX?

CHASX has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to FCNTX (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHASX dropped -45.94% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.