CHASX vs. BLUEX
CHASX (Chase Growth Fund) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CHASX returned 20.48%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for BLUEX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHASX charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.
Performance
CHASX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHASX achieves a 24.18% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CHASX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 20.48%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.
CHASX
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 24.18%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 45.60%
- 3Y*
- 40.76%
- 5Y*
- 21.98%
- 10Y*
- 20.48%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- -7.16%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
CHASX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHASX Chase Growth Fund | 24.18% | 20.61% | 64.71% | 25.91% | -20.41% | 22.32% | 18.27% | 42.63% | -3.96% | 24.49% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -7.33% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHASX and BLUEX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 1997 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CHASX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHASX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
CHASX
BLUEX
CHASX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHASX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.91 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | -0.53 | +5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.09 | -1.22 | +21.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHASX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHASX drawdown since its inception was -45.94%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHASX and BLUEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHASX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.94% | -54.27% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -12.19% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.40% | -12.19% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.63% | -21.87% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | -29.06% | -1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -9.26% | +7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.14% | -13.36% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 5.23% | -2.84% |
Volatility
CHASX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.97%. This indicates that CHASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHASX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 3.97% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 8.31% | +6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 10.47% | +7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 10.72% | +9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 16.57% | +3.38% |
CHASX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHASX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHASX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
CHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
CHASX Chase Growth Fund | 7.35% | 9.12% | 36.67% | 5.80% | 5.49% | 20.15% | 7.83% | 22.82% | 12.92% | 11.92% | 9.14% | 10.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHASX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHASX has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to BLUEX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHASX dropped -45.94% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.
CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHASX and BLUEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer