CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO).
CGXF.TO and SVR.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGXF.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Mar 3, 2022. SVR.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity TR USD. It was launched on Jul 15, 2009.
Performance
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | 6.89% | 114.19% | 11.88% | 1.43% | 1.89% | -6.21% | 15.23% | 20.53% | -18.76% | 5.51% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 4.81% | 140.56% | 18.71% | -0.94% | 0.09% | -13.03% | 42.96% | 12.77% | -9.50% | 4.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGXF.TO achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than SVR.TO's 4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CGXF.TO has underperformed SVR.TO with an annualized return of 13.49%, while SVR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.
CGXF.TO
- 1D
- 6.44%
- 1M
- -17.38%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 70.32%
- 3Y*
- 34.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
SVR.TO
- 1D
- 7.29%
- 1M
- -19.93%
- YTD
- 4.81%
- 6M
- 56.93%
- 1Y
- 112.62%
- 3Y*
- 43.06%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGXF.TO has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SVR.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGXF.TO
SVR.TO
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGXF.TO | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.78 | 2.02 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.17 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.64 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 8.24 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGXF.TO | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.02 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.64 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.48 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.28 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGXF.TO and SVR.TO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, while SVR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | 9.53% | 7.43% | 8.09% | 8.92% | 8.54% | 8.59% | 11.01% | 6.69% | 7.97% | 6.99% | 10.68% | 11.75% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than SVR.TO's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXF.TO and SVR.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGXF.TO | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -77.85% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.39% | -42.63% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -42.63% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.68% | -45.52% | +5.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.38% | -35.78% | +18.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.85% | -50.51% | +19.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 13.68% | -6.28% |
Volatility
CGXF.TO vs. SVR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) is 16.05%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) has a volatility of 18.29%. This indicates that CGXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGXF.TO | SVR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 18.29% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.80% | 55.46% | -22.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.76% | 55.96% | -16.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.17% | 35.61% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.09% | 32.03% | -1.94% |