PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGVV vs. LVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGVV vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGVV achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 14.33% return.


CGVV

1D
0.95%
1M
1.02%
YTD
12.58%
6M
12.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LVDS

1D
0.68%
1M
3.71%
YTD
14.33%
6M
15.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGVV vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGVV and LVDS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGVV vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CGVV vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGVVLVDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

2.47

-0.89

Drawdowns

CGVV vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and LVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGVVLVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-6.64%

-3.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-0.97%

-0.68%

Volatility

CGVV vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGVVLVDSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

10.42%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

10.42%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

10.42%

+3.09%

CGVV vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGVV vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than LVDS's 7.51% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CGVV and LVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGVV.

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.51%, compared with 0.51% for CGVV.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.30% for LVDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGVV and LVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer