PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGVV vs. CSTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGVV vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGVV having a 11.52% return and CSTK slightly lower at 11.29%.


CGVV

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.42%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSTK

1D
0.07%
1M
3.59%
YTD
11.29%
6M
13.04%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGVV vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGVV and CSTK is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGVV vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGVV

CSTK
CSTK Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CSTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGVV vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CGVV vs. CSTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGVVCSTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

2.54

-1.04

Drawdowns

CGVV vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and CSTK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGVVCSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-8.87%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.60%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-1.28%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

CGVV vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGVVCSTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

11.28%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.50%

11.60%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.50%

11.60%

+1.90%

CGVV vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGVV vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison

CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than CSTK's 1.77% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CGVV and CSTK have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSTK.

CSTK has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.51% for CGVV.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.35% for CSTK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGVV and CSTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer