CGVV vs. CSTK
CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) and CSTK (Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGVV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSTK.
Performance
CGVV vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGVV having a 11.52% return and CSTK slightly lower at 11.29%.
CGVV
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSTK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGVV vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 11.52% | 6.41% |
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 11.29% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGVV and CSTK is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGVV vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank
CGVV
CSTK
CGVV vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGVV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 2.54 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
CGVV vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and CSTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGVV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -8.87% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -0.60% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -1.28% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility
CGVV vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGVV | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 11.28% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 11.60% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 11.60% | +1.90% |
CGVV vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGVV vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison
CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than CSTK's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 0.51% | 0.57% |
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 1.77% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGVV and CSTK have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSTK.
CSTK has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.51% for CGVV.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.35% for CSTK.
Find the right allocation for CGVV and CSTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer