CGVV vs. CGMS
CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) and CGMS (Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGVV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGVV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGMS.
Performance
CGVV vs. CGMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGVV achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than CGMS's 1.54% return.
CGVV
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGMS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGVV vs. CGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 13.20% | 6.55% |
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.54% | 4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGVV and CGMS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGVV vs. CGMS — Risk / Return Rank
CGVV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGMS
CGVV vs. CGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGVV | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGVV vs. CGMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, which is greater than CGMS's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and CGMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGVV | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -4.08% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -0.40% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -0.66% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility
CGVV vs. CGMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGVV | CGMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 3.50% | +10.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 5.12% | +8.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 5.12% | +8.76% |
CGVV vs. CGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CGMS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGVV vs. CGMS - Dividend Comparison
CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than CGMS's 6.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF | 6.09% | 6.00% | 5.91% | 5.84% | 0.97% |
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGVV and CGMS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGMS.
CGMS has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 0.50% for CGVV.
CGVV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CGMS is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.39% for CGMS.
Find the right allocation for CGVV and CGMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer