CGVIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
CGVIX is managed by Causeway. It was launched on Apr 28, 2008. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
CGVIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGVIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGVIX Causeway Global Value Fund | -8.49% | 34.03% | 12.85% | 29.80% | -12.06% | 16.44% | 7.39% | 21.26% | -11.23% | 20.22% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGVIX achieves a -8.49% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CGVIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
CGVIX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -13.93%
- YTD
- -8.49%
- 6M
- -1.72%
- 1Y
- 18.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGVIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGVIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGVIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
CGVIX
CSUAX
CGVIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.63 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.17 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.36 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 10.32 | -6.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.63 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.61 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.55 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGVIX and CSUAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CGVIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
CGVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGVIX Causeway Global Value Fund | 10.78% | 9.86% | 24.61% | 2.36% | 0.88% | 3.30% | 1.36% | 4.77% | 18.28% | 8.49% | 1.37% | 3.26% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
CGVIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGVIX drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -52.20% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -7.98% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -20.45% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.30% | -35.05% | -9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.57% | -4.38% | -10.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -8.49% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 1.83% | +2.21% |
Volatility
CGVIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Causeway Global Value Fund (CGVIX) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that CGVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGVIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 3.26% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 6.89% | +4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 11.48% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 12.89% | +9.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 14.89% | +7.04% |