PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGRWX vs. FGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Comstock Select Fund (CGRWX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGRWX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 22.97% return. Over the past 10 years, CGRWX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.


CGRWX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.77%
6M
7.49%
YTD
10.73%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
12.09%
ALL TIME*
12.24%

FGINX

1D
0.73%
1M
3.68%
6M
15.51%
YTD
22.97%
1Y
46.42%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
13.41%
ALL TIME*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGRWX
Invesco Comstock Select Fund
10.73%18.61%11.95%12.17%3.29%30.12%-0.34%27.31%-11.40%15.95%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
22.97%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CGRWX and FGINX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 1993

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between CGRWX and FGINX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGRWX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGRWX
CGRWX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CGRWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGRWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGRWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CGRWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGRWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Select Fund (CGRWX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGRWXFGINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.66

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

5.96

-3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

23.00

-13.73

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGRWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGRWX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGRWX drawdown since its inception was -58.28%, which is greater than FGINX's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRWX and FGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGRWXFGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.28%

-54.80%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-7.34%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.79%

-13.28%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.79%

-16.21%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.23%

-37.37%

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.34%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-9.65%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.91%

+0.86%

Volatility

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Comstock Select Fund (CGRWX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 2.54%. This indicates that CGRWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGRWXFGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.54%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

8.78%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

11.85%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

14.85%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

16.97%

+3.65%

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGRWX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGRWX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

CGRWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than FGINX's 9.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGRWX
Invesco Comstock Select Fund
12.29%13.46%16.99%5.10%16.87%5.35%2.33%27.71%15.07%5.43%1.56%1.20%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
9.04%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGRWX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGRWX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FGINX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGRWX dropped -58.28% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGRWX and FGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer