CGNG vs. CGCP
CGNG (Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF) and CGCP (Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGNG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGCP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGNG returned 35.54% vs 5.84% for CGCP. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGNG charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CGCP.
Performance
CGNG vs. CGCP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGNG achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than CGCP's 0.33% return.
CGNG
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 17.30%
- 1Y
- 35.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGCP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGNG vs. CGCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CGNG Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF | 16.04% | 29.78% | -0.97% |
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 0.33% | 7.35% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGNG and CGCP is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024 | 0.30 |
CGNG vs. CGCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGNG
CGCP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
CGNG
CGCP
-
Financial Services
CGNG
CGCP
-
Industrials
CGNG
CGCP
-
Communication Services
CGNG
CGCP
-
Consumer Cyclical
CGNG
CGCP
-
Basic Materials
CGNG
CGCP
-
Consumer Defensive
CGNG
CGCP
-
Healthcare
CGNG
CGCP
-
Energy
CGNG
CGCP
Utilities
CGNG
CGCP
-
Real Estate
CGNG
CGCP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGNG vs. CGCP — Risk / Return Rank
CGNG
CGCP
CGNG vs. CGCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGNG | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.27 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 7.46 | +3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGNG | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.58 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.26 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
CGNG vs. CGCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGNG drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, which is greater than CGCP's maximum drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNG and CGCP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGNG | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -15.06% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -2.59% | -11.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.16% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -4.93% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 0.78% | +2.46% |
Volatility
CGNG vs. CGCP - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) at 1.33%. This indicates that CGNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGNG | CGCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 1.33% | +5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 2.73% | +12.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.04% | 3.70% | +14.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 6.36% | +11.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 6.36% | +11.81% |
CGNG vs. CGCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGNG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCP's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGNG vs. CGCP - Dividend Comparison
CGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CGCP's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 5.16% | 5.10% | 5.17% | 4.98% | 2.96% |
CGNG Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF | 0.59% | 0.68% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGNG and CGCP have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGNG has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to CGCP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNG dropped -15.90% vs CGCP's -15.06%.
On 1-year performance, CGNG leads with 35.54% vs 5.84% for CGCP. On fees, CGCP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CGCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CGNG has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGCP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for CGNG.
CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.59% for CGNG.
CGNG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while CGCP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for CGNG and 0.34% for CGCP.
CGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGNG and CGCP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer