PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGNG vs. CGCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGNG vs. CGCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGNG achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than CGCP's 0.33% return.


CGNG

1D
-1.36%
1M
6.50%
YTD
16.04%
6M
17.30%
1Y
35.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGCP

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGNG vs. CGCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGNG
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF
16.04%29.78%-0.97%
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
0.33%7.35%2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CGNG and CGCP is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.30

CGNG vs. CGCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGNG
CGCP

Technology

31.4%

-

Financial Services

16.2%

-

Industrials

10.7%

-

Communication Services

10.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%

-

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Energy

3.5%
2.8%

Utilities

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.3%
97.3%

Technology

CGNG
31.4%
CGCP

-

Financial Services

CGNG
16.2%
CGCP

-

Industrials

CGNG
10.7%
CGCP

-

Communication Services

CGNG
10.4%
CGCP

-

Consumer Cyclical

CGNG
9.8%
CGCP

-

Basic Materials

CGNG
7.5%
CGCP

-

Consumer Defensive

CGNG
3.8%
CGCP

-

Healthcare

CGNG
3.5%
CGCP

-

Energy

CGNG
3.5%
CGCP
2.8%

Utilities

CGNG
1.8%
CGCP

-

Real Estate

CGNG
1.3%
CGCP
97.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGNG vs. CGCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGNG
CGNG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCP
CGCP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CGCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGNG vs. CGCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGNGCGCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.27

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

7.46

+3.52

CGNG vs. CGCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the CGCP Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGNG and CGCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGNGCGCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.58

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.26

+1.01

Drawdowns

CGNG vs. CGCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGNG drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, which is greater than CGCP's maximum drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNG and CGCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGNGCGCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-15.06%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-2.59%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.16%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-4.93%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

0.78%

+2.46%

Volatility

CGNG vs. CGCP - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF (CGNG) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) at 1.33%. This indicates that CGNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGNGCGCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

1.33%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

2.73%

+12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

3.70%

+14.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.17%

6.36%

+11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

6.36%

+11.81%

CGNG vs. CGCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGNG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCP's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGNG vs. CGCP - Dividend Comparison

CGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CGCP's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
5.16%5.10%5.17%4.98%2.96%
CGNG
Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF
0.59%0.68%0.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGNG and CGCP have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGNG has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to CGCP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNG dropped -15.90% vs CGCP's -15.06%.

On 1-year performance, CGNG leads with 35.54% vs 5.84% for CGCP. On fees, CGCP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CGCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGNG has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGCP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for CGNG.

CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.59% for CGNG.

CGNG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while CGCP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for CGNG and 0.34% for CGCP.

CGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGNG and CGCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer