CGMS vs. CGCV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGMS (Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF) and CGCV (Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGMS returned 7.10% vs 16.96% for CGCV. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGMS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGCV.

Performance

CGMS vs. CGCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMS achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than CGCV's 5.95% return.

CGMS

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: 7.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGCV

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 6.19%
• 1Y: 16.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMS vs. CGCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	1.54%	7.52%	4.21%
CGCV Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF	5.95%	16.62%	7.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMS and CGCV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	0.51

The correlation between CGMS and CGCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGMS vs. CGCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGMS	CGCV
Real Estate	91.8%	1.8%
Technology	8.2%	23.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.9%
Communication Services	-	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	10.0%
Energy	-	5.4%
Financial Services	-	12.2%
Healthcare	-	13.9%
Industrials	-	9.9%
Utilities	-	8.6%

Return for Risk

CGMS vs. CGCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMS

CGMS Risk / Return Rank: 63
CGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CGCV

CGCV Risk / Return Rank: 49
CGCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CGCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CGCV Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CGCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CGCV Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMS vs. CGCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGMS	CGCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.75	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.47	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.32	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	2.15	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.89	8.67	+4.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGMS vs. CGCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMS Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the CGCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMS and CGCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGMS	CGCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	1.75	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.66	1.26	+0.40

Drawdowns

CGMS vs. CGCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMS drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum CGCV drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMS and CGCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMS	CGCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-13.13%	+9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-7.93%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.25%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	-1.67%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	1.96%	-1.41%

Volatility

CGMS vs. CGCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) is 1.15%, while Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) has a volatility of 2.41%. This indicates that CGMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMS	CGCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	2.41%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.66%	7.45%	-4.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43%	9.72%	-6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.13%	12.65%	-7.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.13%	12.65%	-7.52%

CGMS vs. CGCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGMS vs. CGCV - Dividend Comparison

CGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than CGCV's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGCV Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF	1.46%	1.44%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	6.09%	6.00%	5.91%	5.84%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGMS and CGCV in my portfolio?

CGMS and CGCV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGMS or CGCV?

CGCV has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to CGMS (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMS dropped -4.08% vs CGCV's -13.13%.

Which ETF is better, CGMS or CGCV?

On 1-year performance, CGCV leads with 16.96% vs 7.10% for CGMS. On fees, CGCV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGMS has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGMS or CGCV?

Over the 1-year period, CGCV has performed better with a 16.96% return vs 7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGMS or CGCV?

CGCV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGMS or CGCV?

CGMS has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 1.46% for CGCV.

What is the main difference between CGMS and CGCV?

CGMS is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while CGCV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGMS and 0.33% for CGCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.