PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGMM vs. CTEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGMM vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMM achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.


CGMM

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.79%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.78%
1Y
23.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTEF

1D
-0.41%
1M
10.65%
YTD
29.35%
6M
31.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMM vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CGMM
Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF
10.58%11.16%
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
29.35%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMM and CTEF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGMM vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMM
CGMM Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CGMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGMM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CGMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CTEF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMM vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGMMCTEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

CGMM vs. CTEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGMMCTEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

3.54

-2.73

Drawdowns

CGMM vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMM drawdown since its inception was -21.04%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMM and CTEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGMMCTEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-15.00%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.41%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-1.80%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

CGMM vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGMMCTEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

21.81%

-6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

21.81%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.29%

21.81%

-1.52%

CGMM vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGMM vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison

CGMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CGMM and CTEF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for CGMM.

CGMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for CGMM and 0.45% for CTEF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGMM and CTEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer