CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO
CGLO.TO (CIBC Global Growth ETF) and TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGLO.TO returned 7.12%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for TINF.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGLO.TO achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than TINF.TO's 14.35% return.
CGLO.TO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
TINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 19.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 5.72% | 4.24% | 17.98% | 18.74% | -14.90% | 17.27% | 9.87% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 14.35% | 14.91% | 22.73% | 4.63% | 3.82% | 9.89% | 5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGLO.TO and TINF.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2020 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGLO.TO
TINF.TO
CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) and TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGLO.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 3.97 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 9.76 | -7.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGLO.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, which is greater than TINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGLO.TO and TINF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGLO.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -13.62% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -5.03% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -10.23% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -13.62% | -11.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -2.53% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -2.44% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 2.04% | +1.84% |
Volatility
CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) at 3.03%. This indicates that CGLO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGLO.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 3.03% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 9.19% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 10.74% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 11.89% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 12.05% | +2.19% |
Dividends
CGLO.TO vs. TINF.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGLO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TINF.TO's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 0.31% | 0.13% | 0.77% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 2.97% | 2.28% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGLO.TO and TINF.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CIBC and TD.
Find the right allocation for CGLO.TO and TINF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer