CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO
CGLO.TO (CIBC Global Growth ETF) and TEQT.TO (TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. CGLO.TO is actively managed, while TEQT.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CGLO.TO returned 9.94% vs 27.68% for TEQT.TO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGLO.TO achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than TEQT.TO's 13.62% return.
CGLO.TO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
TEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 27.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 5.72% | 13.94% |
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 13.62% | 27.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGLO.TO and TEQT.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between CGLO.TO and TEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGLO.TO
TEQT.TO
CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) and TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGLO.TO | TEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 3.65 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 14.58 | -12.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGLO.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, which is greater than TEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGLO.TO and TEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGLO.TO | TEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -7.62% | -17.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -7.62% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -1.52% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -1.00% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 1.90% | +1.98% |
Volatility
CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO) at 3.08%. This indicates that CGLO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGLO.TO | TEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 3.08% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 9.61% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 11.84% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 12.32% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 12.32% | +1.92% |
Dividends
CGLO.TO vs. TEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGLO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TEQT.TO's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 0.31% | 0.13% | 0.77% |
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.25% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGLO.TO and TEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CIBC and TD.
Find the right allocation for CGLO.TO and TEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer