CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
CGLO.TO (CIBC Global Growth ETF) and ONEQ.TO (CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGLO.TO returned 7.12%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for ONEQ.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGLO.TO achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ.TO's 14.56% return.
CGLO.TO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 5.72% | 4.24% | 17.98% | 18.74% | -14.90% | 17.27% | 9.87% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 14.56% | 17.62% | 22.45% | 19.07% | -10.74% | 21.65% | 15.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGLO.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2020 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGLO.TO
ONEQ.TO
CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGLO.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.46 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 4.07 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 17.98 | -15.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGLO.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGLO.TO and ONEQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGLO.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -34.40% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -6.66% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -16.08% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -17.61% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -0.68% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -3.70% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 1.51% | +2.37% |
Volatility
CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) at 2.84%. This indicates that CGLO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGLO.TO | ONEQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 2.84% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 9.88% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 11.96% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 13.28% | +1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 13.91% | +0.33% |
Dividends
CGLO.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGLO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than ONEQ.TO's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 0.31% | 0.13% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ.TO CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF | 1.59% | 1.60% | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGLO.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CIBC and CI.
Find the right allocation for CGLO.TO and ONEQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer