CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO
CGLO.TO (CIBC Global Growth ETF) and CINT.TO (CIBC International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGLO.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by CIBC, while CINT.TO is a International Equity fund actively managed by CIBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGLO.TO returned 7.12%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for CINT.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGLO.TO having a 5.72% return and CINT.TO slightly lower at 5.69%.
CGLO.TO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- —
CINT.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 5.72% | 4.24% | 17.98% | 18.74% | -14.90% | 17.27% | 9.87% |
CINT.TO CIBC International Equity ETF | 5.69% | 2.86% | 6.50% | 15.15% | -18.71% | 11.57% | 8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGLO.TO and CINT.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between CGLO.TO and CINT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGLO.TO
CINT.TO
CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) and CIBC International Equity ETF (CINT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGLO.TO | CINT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.08 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.59 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 1.81 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGLO.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum CINT.TO drawdown of -29.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGLO.TO and CINT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGLO.TO | CINT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -29.69% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -12.30% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -15.39% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -29.69% | +4.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -3.14% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -7.57% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.02% | -0.14% |
Volatility
CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC Global Growth ETF (CGLO.TO) and CIBC International Equity ETF (CINT.TO) have volatilities of 5.33% and 5.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGLO.TO | CINT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 5.14% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 16.32% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 18.71% | -4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 15.27% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 14.74% | -0.50% |
Dividends
CGLO.TO vs. CINT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGLO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CINT.TO's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGLO.TO CIBC Global Growth ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 0.31% | 0.13% | 0.77% |
CINT.TO CIBC International Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGLO.TO and CINT.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGLO.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CINT.TO is International Equity.
Find the right allocation for CGLO.TO and CINT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer