CGL.TO vs. CRWD
CGL.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)) is Gold fund tracking the Gold Bullion, while CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CGL.TO returned 15.73%/yr vs 27.82%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGL.TO vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CGL.TO is traded in CAD, while CRWD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRWD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGL.TO achieves a -3.19% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 48.61% return.
CGL.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -3.25%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 27.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 17.02%
- YTD
- 48.61%
- 6M
- 37.20%
- 1Y
- 45.99%
- 3Y*
- 67.07%
- 5Y*
- 27.82%
- 10Y*
- —
CGL.TO vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -3.19% | 60.08% | 25.70% | 11.26% | -1.07% | -4.58% | 23.41% | 13.46% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 48.61% | 30.75% | 45.36% | 136.72% | -45.32% | -3.39% | 314.67% | -22.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGL.TO and CRWD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGL.TO vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
CGL.TO
CRWD
CGL.TO vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGL.TO | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 1.16 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 2.63 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGL.TO vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGL.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.96%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -65.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGL.TO and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGL.TO | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.96% | -65.54% | +19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.93% | -38.93% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -43.59% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -64.92% | +39.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.50% | -11.59% | -10.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.30% | -22.61% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.66% | 17.10% | -8.44% |
Volatility
CGL.TO vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) is 7.67%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 18.19%. This indicates that CGL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGL.TO | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | 18.19% | -10.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.08% | 37.64% | -13.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 45.52% | -17.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 50.90% | -32.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 56.57% | -40.04% |
Dividends
CGL.TO vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CGL.TO nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CGL.TO and CRWD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CGL.TO and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer