CGIB vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CGIB (Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CGIB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. CGIB is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, CGIB returned 2.85% vs 29.75% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. CGIB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

CGIB vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIB achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 51.89% return.

CGIB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: 2.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -17.64%
• YTD: 51.89%
• 6M: 50.65%
• 1Y: 29.75%
• 3Y*: 14.76%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: 9.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIB vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	0.93%	4.72%	2.44%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	51.89%	-11.71%	-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIB and DBO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	-0.22

Return for Risk

CGIB vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIB

CGIB Risk / Return Rank: 21
CGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
CGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 22

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 26
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIB vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGIB	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.86	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	1.36	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.17	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	1.35	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.68	3.56	-0.87

CGIB vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIB and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGIB vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIB drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIB and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGIB	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-90.18%	+87.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-22.14%	+19.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-60.03%	+59.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-62.22%	+61.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	9.52%	-8.46%

Volatility

CGIB vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) is 0.99%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that CGIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGIB	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.99%	10.39%	-9.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	29.37%	-26.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.05%	34.94%	-30.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	32.53%	-28.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	31.84%	-28.08%

CGIB vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGIB vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

CGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than DBO's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	4.24%	4.26%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	2.31%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGIB and DBO in my portfolio?

CGIB and DBO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGIB or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to CGIB (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIB dropped -2.68% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, CGIB or DBO?

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 29.75% vs 2.85% for CGIB. On fees, CGIB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CGIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGIB or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 29.75% return vs 2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGIB or DBO?

CGIB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGIB or DBO?

CGIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 2.31% for DBO.

What is the main difference between CGIB and DBO?

CGIB is categorized as Global Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CGIB and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.