CGIB vs. CGMS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGIB (Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)) and CGMS (Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGIB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGIB returned 2.83% vs 6.78% for CGMS. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGIB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGMS.

Performance

CGIB vs. CGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than CGMS's 1.69% return.

CGIB

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 2.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGMS

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.69%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 8.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIB vs. CGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	0.50%	4.72%	2.62%
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	1.69%	7.52%	4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIB and CGMS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024	0.48

The correlation between CGIB and CGMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CGIB vs. CGMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIB

CGIB Risk / Return Rank: 22
CGIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
CGIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
CGIB Omega Ratio Rank: 21
CGIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CGIB Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CGMS

CGMS Risk / Return Rank: 63
CGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIB vs. CGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGIB	CGMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	2.00	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	3.00	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.38	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	2.76	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	12.33	-9.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGIB vs. CGMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the CGMS Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIB and CGMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGIB	CGMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	2.00	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	1.67	-0.58

Drawdowns

CGIB vs. CGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIB drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, smaller than the maximum CGMS drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIB and CGMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGIB	CGMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-4.08%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-2.47%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-0.11%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-0.67%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	0.55%	+0.50%

Volatility

CGIB vs. CGMS - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged) (CGIB) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) at 1.14%. This indicates that CGIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGIB	CGMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	1.14%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.92%	2.66%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	3.43%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	5.13%	-1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	5.13%	-1.37%

CGIB vs. CGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGIB vs. CGMS - Dividend Comparison

CGIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than CGMS's 6.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGIB Capital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)	4.26%	4.26%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	6.09%	6.00%	5.91%	5.84%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGIB and CGMS in my portfolio?

CGIB and CGMS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGIB or CGMS?

CGIB has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to CGMS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIB dropped -2.68% vs CGMS's -4.08%.

Which ETF is better, CGIB or CGMS?

On 1-year performance, CGMS leads with 6.78% vs 2.83% for CGIB. On fees, CGMS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CGMS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGIB or CGMS?

Over the 1-year period, CGMS has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGIB or CGMS?

CGMS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CGIB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGIB or CGMS?

CGMS has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 4.26% for CGIB.

What is the main difference between CGIB and CGMS?

CGIB is categorized as Global Bonds, while CGMS is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CGIB and 0.39% for CGMS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.