CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGHY.TO (CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series) and NHYB.TO (NBI High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGHY.TO returned 9.45%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for NHYB.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGHY.TO charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for NHYB.TO.

Performance

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series (CGHY.TO) and NBI High Yield Bond ETF (NHYB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGHY.TO achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than NHYB.TO's 0.28% return.

CGHY.TO

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 2.75%
• 1Y: 7.80%
• 3Y*: 9.27%
• 5Y*: 9.45%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

NHYB.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 7.60%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CGHY.TO CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series	3.03%	6.19%	9.66%	13.41%	13.50%	2.47%	3.24%
NHYB.TO NBI High Yield Bond ETF	0.28%	7.23%	7.06%	11.06%	-10.24%	4.97%	0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CGHY.TO and NHYB.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2020	0.06

Return for Risk

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHY.TO

CGHY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 48
CGHY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CGHY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CGHY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CGHY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CGHY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

NHYB.TO

NHYB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 28
NHYB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NHYB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NHYB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NHYB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
NHYB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series (CGHY.TO) and NBI High Yield Bond ETF (NHYB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGHY.TO	NHYB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	0.73	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.12	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.14	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	1.76	+1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	5.94	+5.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGHY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the NHYB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGHY.TO and NHYB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGHY.TO	NHYB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	0.73	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.44	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.31	+0.15

Drawdowns

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than NHYB.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHY.TO and NHYB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGHY.TO	NHYB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.44%	-21.70%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.18%	-2.42%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.92%	-3.80%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.81%	-14.85%	+5.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.55%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-3.02%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.72%	-0.05%

Volatility

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series (CGHY.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to NBI High Yield Bond ETF (NHYB.TO) at 1.11%. This indicates that CGHY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHYB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGHY.TO	NHYB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	1.11%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.14%	3.88%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.38%	5.86%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	9.09%	+5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.00%	13.84%	-0.84%

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHY.TO has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB.TO's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGHY.TO vs. NHYB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than NHYB.TO's 5.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGHY.TO CI High Yield Bond Private Pool ETF C$ Series	5.25%	5.40%	4.99%	5.14%	5.08%	6.32%	6.08%	5.65%	5.91%	5.45%	5.57%	5.23%
NHYB.TO NBI High Yield Bond ETF	5.48%	5.53%	5.65%	6.01%	6.23%	5.80%	3.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGHY.TO and NHYB.TO in my portfolio?

CGHY.TO and NHYB.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CGHY.TO or NHYB.TO?

On fees, NHYB.TO is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGHY.TO or NHYB.TO?

NHYB.TO is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for CGHY.TO.

What is the main difference between CGHY.TO and NHYB.TO?

They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and National Bank Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for CGHY.TO and 0.68% for NHYB.TO.