PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGFIX vs. ASGI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGFIX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than ASGI's 7.00% return.


CGFIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.22%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.88%

ASGI

1D
1.65%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
7.00%
6M
7.16%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CGFIX
abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund
1.26%5.79%4.85%-2.54%-9.99%1.39%4.82%
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
7.00%44.20%10.26%14.48%-10.50%18.17%-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CGFIX and ASGI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.12

The correlation between CGFIX and ASGI shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGFIX vs. ASGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGFIX
CGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ASGI
ASGI Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ASGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASGI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ASGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASGI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGFIXASGIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.29

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.92

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

6.91

+1.56

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the ASGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGFIX and ASGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGFIXASGIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.57

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.66

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.75

+0.14

Drawdowns

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGFIX drawdown since its inception was -20.28%, smaller than the maximum ASGI drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGFIX and ASGI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGFIXASGIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.28%

-23.71%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-15.15%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-16.24%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-23.71%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-7.55%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-5.90%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

4.21%

-3.44%

Volatility

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) is 1.09%, while Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that CGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGFIXASGIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

5.45%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

16.53%

-14.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

18.58%

-15.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

16.82%

-11.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

17.38%

-12.67%

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGFIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGI's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGFIX vs. ASGI - Dividend Comparison

CGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than ASGI's 11.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
11.35%10.96%12.84%8.03%8.25%6.33%1.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CGFIX
abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund
6.15%5.51%6.43%2.08%0.00%7.49%0.23%3.29%6.05%0.33%1.12%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGFIX and ASGI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASGI has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to CGFIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGFIX dropped -20.28% vs ASGI's -23.71%.

CGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGFIX and ASGI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer