PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGFAX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class 529-A (CGFAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGFAX achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 24.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CGFAX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 14.97%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.69% annualized return.


CGFAX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-2.33%
6M
2.17%
YTD
4.27%
1Y
10.07%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
14.97%
ALL TIME*
10.57%

CHASX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.39%
6M
18.47%
YTD
24.24%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
38.62%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
19.69%
ALL TIME*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGFAX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class 529-A
4.27%19.69%27.99%37.14%-30.76%19.26%37.81%28.09%-3.25%26.06%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
24.24%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CGFAX and CHASX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2002

0.90

The correlation between CGFAX and CHASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGFAX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGFAX
CGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class 529-A (CGFAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGFAXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.93

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

15.83

-13.08

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGFAX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGFAX drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGFAX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGFAXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-45.94%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-9.90%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.58%

-23.40%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-24.63%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-30.40%

-5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-2.34%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-9.12%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

2.45%

+1.27%

Volatility

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class 529-A (CGFAX) is 4.47%, while Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that CGFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGFAXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

5.67%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

14.74%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

18.89%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

20.45%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

20.00%

-0.22%

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGFAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGFAX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

CGFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.44%, more than CHASX's 7.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGFAX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class 529-A
10.44%10.88%9.12%7.48%4.09%8.26%4.34%7.18%12.03%7.07%6.60%8.86%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.34%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGFAX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to CGFAX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGFAX dropped -51.91% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGFAX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer