CGCV vs. ELCV
CGCV (Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF) and ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGCV returned 17.48% vs 32.68% for ELCV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGCV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ELCV.
Performance
CGCV vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGCV achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 21.94% return.
CGCV
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELCV
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 21.94%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 32.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGCV vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CGCV Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF | 6.45% | 16.62% | -1.92% |
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 21.94% | 9.96% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGCV and ELCV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between CGCV and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGCV vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank
CGCV
ELCV
CGCV vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGCV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.51 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 6.50 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.94 | 23.06 | -14.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGCV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.87 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 1.17 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CGCV vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGCV drawdown since its inception was -13.13%, smaller than the maximum ELCV drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCV and ELCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGCV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.13% | -18.38% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.93% | -5.05% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -3.74% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.42% | +0.54% |
Volatility
CGCV vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is 2.39%, while Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that CGCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGCV | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 3.56% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 8.74% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 11.47% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 15.36% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 15.36% | -2.72% |
CGCV vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGCV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGCV vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison
CGCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than ELCV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CGCV Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF | 1.45% | 1.44% | 0.68% |
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 1.75% | 2.34% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGCV and ELCV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELCV has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to CGCV (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGCV dropped -13.13% vs ELCV's -18.38%.
On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 32.68% vs 17.48% for CGCV. On fees, CGCV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 32.68% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGCV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ELCV.
ELCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.45% for CGCV.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGCV and 0.49% for ELCV.
ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGCV and ELCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer