PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGCP vs. INMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGCP vs. INMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGCP vs. INMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
-0.21%7.35%2.95%7.17%-9.78%
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
-0.03%5.52%2.77%6.50%-5.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGCP achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than INMU's -0.03% return.


CGCP

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
0.83%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
10Y*

INMU

1D
0.21%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
1.59%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGCP vs. INMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGCP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than INMU's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGCP vs. INMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGCP
CGCP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CGCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

INMU
INMU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
INMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
INMU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
INMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
INMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGCP vs. INMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGCPINMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.07

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

1.37

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.51

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.00

5.35

+0.65

CGCP vs. INMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the INMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGCP and INMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGCPINMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.07

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.51

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between CGCP and INMU is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CGCP vs. INMU - Dividend Comparison

CGCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than INMU's 3.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
5.16%5.10%5.17%4.98%2.96%0.00%
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
3.43%3.48%3.47%3.44%1.92%1.14%

Drawdowns

CGCP vs. INMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCP drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, which is greater than INMU's maximum drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCP and INMU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGCPINMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-10.67%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-3.15%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-2.38%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-2.86%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.89%

-0.07%

Volatility

CGCP vs. INMU - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) at 1.25%. This indicates that CGCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGCPINMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

1.25%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

1.86%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

4.34%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.44%

3.59%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.44%

3.58%

+2.86%