CGCP vs. CGVV
CGCP (Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF) and CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGCP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGVV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGCP charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGVV.
Performance
CGCP vs. CGVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGCP achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than CGVV's 11.52% return.
CGCP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGVV
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGCP vs. CGVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 0.33% | 3.53% |
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 11.52% | 6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGCP and CGVV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGCP vs. CGVV — Risk / Return Rank
CGCP
CGVV
CGCP vs. CGVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGCP | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGCP | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.50 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
CGCP vs. CGVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGCP drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, which is greater than CGVV's maximum drawdown of -10.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCP and CGVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGCP | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -10.11% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -1.10% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -1.66% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility
CGCP vs. CGVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGCP | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 13.50% | -9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 13.50% | -7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 13.50% | -7.14% |
CGCP vs. CGVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGCP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than CGVV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGCP vs. CGVV - Dividend Comparison
CGCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than CGVV's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF | 5.16% | 5.10% | 5.17% | 4.98% | 2.96% |
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 0.51% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGCP and CGVV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CGCP.
CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.51% for CGVV.
CGCP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CGVV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGCP and 0.33% for CGVV.
Find the right allocation for CGCP and CGVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer