PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGCP vs. CGUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGCP vs. CGUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGCP achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than CGUI's 1.50% return.


CGCP

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
10Y*

CGUI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGCP vs. CGUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
0.33%7.35%2.16%
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
1.50%4.99%3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CGCP and CGUI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGCP vs. CGUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGCP
CGCP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CGCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CGUI
CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGCP vs. CGUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGCPCGUIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

5.99

-4.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

10.92

-8.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

2.66

-1.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

24.99

-22.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.46

105.06

-97.60

CGCP vs. CGUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the CGUI Sharpe Ratio of 5.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGCP and CGUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGCPCGUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

5.99

-4.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

6.20

-5.94

Drawdowns

CGCP vs. CGUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCP drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, which is greater than CGUI's maximum drawdown of -0.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCP and CGUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGCPCGUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-0.18%

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-0.18%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.04%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-0.02%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.04%

+0.74%

Volatility

CGCP vs. CGUI - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) at 0.30%. This indicates that CGCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGCPCGUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

0.30%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

0.56%

+2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

0.74%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

0.80%

+5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

0.80%

+5.56%

CGCP vs. CGUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGCP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than CGUI's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGCP vs. CGUI - Dividend Comparison

CGCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than CGUI's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
5.16%5.10%5.17%4.98%2.96%
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
3.89%4.17%2.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGCP and CGUI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGCP has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to CGUI (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGCP dropped -15.06% vs CGUI's -0.18%.

On 1-year performance, CGCP leads with 5.84% vs 4.42% for CGUI. On fees, CGUI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CGUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGCP has performed better with a 5.84% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGUI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CGCP.

CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 3.89% for CGUI.

CGCP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CGUI is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGCP and 0.18% for CGUI.

CGUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGCP and CGUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer