PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) and Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (XSX6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGB.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than XSX6.DE's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CGB.DE has underperformed XSX6.DE with an annualized return of 2.48%, while XSX6.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


CGB.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
1.32%
6M
7.77%
YTD
8.00%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
2.48%

XSX6.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
4.56%
6M
10.88%
YTD
11.63%
1Y
22.49%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGB.DE
Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
8.00%-6.58%9.93%-2.82%-0.10%15.85%-0.38%4.86%4.94%-7.90%
XSX6.DE
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
11.63%20.91%8.35%15.54%-10.63%24.87%-1.83%28.68%-11.34%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CGB.DE and XSX6.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.06

The correlation between CGB.DE and XSX6.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (3 years) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGB.DE
CGB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CGB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CGB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XSX6.DE
XSX6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XSX6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) and Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (XSX6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGB.DEXSX6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

2.37

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

9.17

+2.74

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the XSX6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGB.DE and XSX6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGB.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum XSX6.DE drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGB.DE and XSX6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGB.DEXSX6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.06%

-36.06%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-9.46%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-16.37%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.94%

-20.84%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.64%

-36.06%

+21.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-5.24%

-4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

2.44%

-1.48%

Volatility

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) is 1.70%, while Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (XSX6.DE) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that CGB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSX6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGB.DEXSX6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

3.11%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.01%

10.96%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

13.02%

-7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.74%

14.46%

-7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.06%

15.23%

-4.17%

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGB.DE and XSX6.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGB.DE vs. XSX6.DE - Dividend Comparison

CGB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while XSX6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGB.DE
Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.00%2.40%2.37%2.97%4.40%2.17%2.15%2.56%0.72%2.64%0.38%
XSX6.DE
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGB.DE and XSX6.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CGB.DE and XSX6.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

CGB.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while XSX6.DE is Europe Equities. CGB.DE tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index, while XSX6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGB.DE and XSX6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer