PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGAU vs. EMEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGAU achieves a 20.32% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 53.76% return.


CGAU

1D
-6.17%
1M
10.62%
6M
3.16%
YTD
20.32%
1Y
157.08%
3Y*
46.41%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.24%

EMEQ

1D
1.33%
1M
-11.21%
6M
30.45%
YTD
53.76%
1Y
107.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
65.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.01M$24.30M$25.95M
$8.75M$9.16M$11.52M

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
20.32%159.49%-13.08%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
53.76%69.78%-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CGAU and EMEQ is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGAU vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGAU
CGAU Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CGAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGAU Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CGAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGAUEMEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.36

4.13

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

15.08

-2.62

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGAU and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGAU drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAU and EMEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGAUEMEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-26.25%

-37.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

-26.25%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.78%

-20.86%

+3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.41%

-4.67%

-24.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

7.18%

+5.48%

Volatility

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) at 14.87%. This indicates that CGAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGAUEMEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.09%

14.87%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.21%

37.54%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.61%

40.39%

+13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.52%

34.15%

+13.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.98%

34.15%

+14.83%

Dividends

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

CGAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than EMEQ's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
1.18%1.39%3.59%3.45%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.79%2.76%0.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGAU and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGAU has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to EMEQ (14.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGAU dropped -63.47% vs EMEQ's -26.25%.

CGAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGAU and EMEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer