PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGAU vs. EMEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGAU achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 70.04% return.


CGAU

1D
0.06%
1M
3.84%
6M
6.21%
YTD
13.53%
1Y
125.65%
3Y*
41.80%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*

EMEQ

1D
0.10%
1M
0.76%
6M
58.06%
YTD
70.04%
1Y
127.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
13.53%159.49%-13.08%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
70.04%69.78%-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CGAU and EMEQ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGAU vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGAU
CGAU Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CGAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CGAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGAUEMEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.51

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

6.98

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

23.27

-11.97

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGAU and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGAU drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAU and EMEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGAUEMEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-19.99%

-43.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

-17.91%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.42%

-12.48%

-9.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.49%

-4.19%

-25.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

5.36%

+6.16%

Volatility

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) is 15.89%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that CGAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGAUEMEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.89%

18.22%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.07%

35.48%

+7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.55%

38.20%

+14.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.18%

33.24%

+13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.83%

33.24%

+15.59%

Dividends

CGAU vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

CGAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than EMEQ's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
1.25%1.39%3.59%3.45%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.62%2.76%0.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGAU and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMEQ has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to CGAU (15.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGAU dropped -63.47% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGAU and EMEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer