CGAEX vs. OEPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class A (CGAEX) and Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX).
CGAEX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on May 31, 2007. OEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 4, 2006.
Performance
CGAEX vs. OEPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGAEX vs. OEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAEX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class A | 4.15% | 32.27% | -7.33% | 5.40% | -17.66% | 6.50% | 61.15% | 33.16% | -19.66% | 29.42% |
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 65.25% | -1.85% | -15.41% | -3.76% | 88.50% | 14.90% | -91.88% | -4.45% | -58.58% | -22.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGAEX achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly lower than OEPIX's 65.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CGAEX has outperformed OEPIX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while OEPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -20.24% annualized return.
CGAEX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 41.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
OEPIX
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 65.25%
- 6M
- 96.48%
- 1Y
- 90.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- -20.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGAEX vs. OEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGAEX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than OEPIX's 1.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGAEX vs. OEPIX — Risk / Return Rank
CGAEX
OEPIX
CGAEX vs. OEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class A (CGAEX) and Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGAEX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | 1.52 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | 1.97 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.18 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.21 | 5.61 | +8.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGAEX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 1.52 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.30 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | -0.30 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.25 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGAEX and OEPIX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CGAEX vs. OEPIX - Dividend Comparison
CGAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than OEPIX's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGAEX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class A | 0.49% | 0.51% | 0.91% | 0.83% | 0.65% | 0.26% | 0.66% | 1.01% | 1.69% | 1.19% | 1.06% | 0.20% |
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 0.53% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CGAEX vs. OEPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGAEX drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, smaller than the maximum OEPIX drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAEX and OEPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGAEX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.34% | -99.30% | +22.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.15% | -39.36% | +28.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -65.50% | +32.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.53% | -97.79% | +60.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.85% | -97.86% | +79.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.03% | -71.84% | +20.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 15.28% | -12.64% |
Volatility
CGAEX vs. OEPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class A (CGAEX) is 6.91%, while Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that CGAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OEPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGAEX | OEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 11.57% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 33.14% | -21.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 60.15% | -41.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 57.70% | -38.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 66.61% | -46.99% |