PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CG1G.DE achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than SXRY.DE's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CG1G.DE has underperformed SXRY.DE with an annualized return of 9.92%, while SXRY.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.


CG1G.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
3.96%
6M
4.67%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
9.92%

SXRY.DE

1D
0.69%
1M
5.82%
6M
19.64%
YTD
20.71%
1Y
38.08%
3Y*
28.71%
5Y*
21.25%
10Y*
16.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CG1G.DE
Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc)
4.76%22.68%18.23%19.47%-12.77%15.19%3.12%24.73%-18.14%12.10%
SXRY.DE
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
20.71%37.80%18.15%33.34%-9.13%26.71%-4.02%33.22%-14.32%16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CG1G.DE and SXRY.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010

0.74

The correlation between CG1G.DE and SXRY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CG1G.DE
CG1G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CG1G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRY.DE
SXRY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SXRY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CG1G.DESXRY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.41

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

3.91

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

14.41

-12.58

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CG1G.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the SXRY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CG1G.DE and SXRY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CG1G.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, smaller than the maximum SXRY.DE drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG1G.DE and SXRY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CG1G.DESXRY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-43.59%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-9.69%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-17.61%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

-25.00%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

-40.81%

+2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-11.59%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

2.63%

+1.35%

Volatility

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE) at 3.87%. This indicates that CG1G.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CG1G.DESXRY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.87%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

12.85%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

15.99%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.24%

18.30%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

19.56%

-1.52%

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CG1G.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRY.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CG1G.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CG1G.DE nor SXRY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CG1G.DE and SXRY.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CG1G.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CG1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for SXRY.DE.

CG1G.DE tracks DAX Index, while SXRY.DE tracks FTSE MIB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CG1G.DE and 0.33% for SXRY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CG1G.DE and SXRY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer